Debunking Anti-Fluoridation Arguments

Simple replies

(click for details)

Tweet or Post the Details

Fluoridation of drinking water IS effective.

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Fluoridation is based upon robust and reliable scientific evidence

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Fluoride protects all teeth, regardless of age

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Fluoridation chemicals mixed in water supplies are natural and non-toxic

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Fluoridation chemicals are often a by-product, never an industrial waste

 fb-tooth tweet-tooth

Technical grade fluoridation chemicals  are safe and effective

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Some fluoridation chemicals come from China; SO WHAT?

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Only a very small percent (around 3%) of children are likely to develop noticeable fluorosis

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

There is NO compelling evidence of fluoridation of drinking water increasing rates of osteosarcoma

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Anecdotal evidence is UNSUBSTANTIATED evidence that DOES NOT provide a case against fluoride

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Trace elements that may be found in fluoridation chemicals have no observed health impacts

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

The National Institute of Health (NIH) funded study DOES support drinking water fluoridation

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Fluoridation of drinking water is NOT the only source of fluoride. We consume is all the time

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Commercial dental hygiene products are unrelated to water fluoridation

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

Health Experts DO understand fluoride dose

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

IQ is unaffected by fluoridation of drinking water to WHO recommended levels

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

breast milk is no argument against fluoridation

 fb-toothtweet-tooth

____________________________________________________________________

Have you heard of any other anti-fluoridation arguments that I’ve not covered? Feel free to forward them to me via the post submissions forms here and, time pending, I’ll do what I can to provide a strong counter-argument based upon facts.

Advertisements