Debunking Anti-Fluoridation Arguments

Simple replies (click for details)	Tweet or Post the Details
Fluoridation of drinking water IS effective.
Fluoridation is based upon robust and reliable scientific evidence
Fluoride protects all teeth, regardless of age
Fluoridation chemicals mixed in water supplies are natural and non-toxic
Fluoridation chemicals are often a by-product, never an industrial waste
Technical grade fluoridation chemicals  are safe and effective
Some fluoridation chemicals come from China; SO WHAT?
Only a very small percent (around 3%) of children are likely to develop noticeable fluorosis
There is NO compelling evidence of fluoridation of drinking water increasing rates of osteosarcoma
Anecdotal evidence is UNSUBSTANTIATED evidence that DOES NOT provide a case against fluoride
Trace elements that may be found in fluoridation chemicals have no observed health impacts
The National Institute of Health (NIH) funded study DOES support drinking water fluoridation
Fluoridation of drinking water is NOT the only source of fluoride. We consume is all the time
Commercial dental hygiene products are unrelated to water fluoridation
Health Experts DO understand fluoride dose
IQ is unaffected by fluoridation of drinking water to WHO recommended levels
breast milk is no argument against fluoridation

____________________________________________________________________

Have you heard of any other anti-fluoridation arguments that I’ve not covered? Feel free to forward them to me via the post submissions forms here and, time pending, I’ll do what I can to provide a strong counter-argument based upon facts.

Advertisement