lol…
I just strolled over to Jo Nova’s blog again and couldn’t help but chuckle. She’s found a write-up that she’s titled, “Science in an echo chamber” (see it here). It just oozes bias and quite open contempt for climate science. It makes you think…
If scientists highlight the arguments that go on between various research papers, the deniers are quick to scream that there is no consensus.
If scientists sign a letter confirming that this is an unwarranted attack and papers are published that demonstrate that the majority of research by more experienced scientists concur that human activity is contributing to climate change, deniers scream that science isn’t done through consensus and suggest that this demonstrates conspiracy and/or a buddy system.
It’s far from a level playing field, is it? Indeed it makes clearer the divide between science and anti-science.
If Jo’s heroes had anything important to contribute, they would be taken seriously. Only people like Jo take them seriously because they confirm her already set beliefs. There is no climate change orthodoxy Jo, but a number of reasons why this warming trend is obviously the result of an increasing greenhouse effect and that we are somewhat responsible through pumping out millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases each year. Scorn can’t make it otherwise. Air conditioners aren’t confusing us. Bio-physical indicators are already showing that this temperature change over time is having an impact.
We clearly should be worried.
No, science is not in an echo chamber, but unfortunately scientists are raising their voices against this propaganda. I feel that Jo should get her hearing checked.
Why does the character with the huge megaphone make me think of Lord Munchkin?
LikeLike
lol.. can you tell who I modeled him on? hehe… he first appeared in one of my Warm Fuzzy Forecasts – Bedtime Stories with
Mr.Capt D. Nial. In that comic he uses Monckton’s biofuel scare (ie. starving the greater pop to rule the world) to entice a child to sleep with the light on (consume more)… since then he’s been a wonderful character to represent denial. 🙂LikeLike
You could at least have given TrueSkeptic a link. 🙂
LikeLike
lol – sorry about that. I tend to do that a bit – John told me off for doing that on Skeptical Science as well…
LikeLike
I didn’t think of looking under Graphics, I confess.
And … your WFFs are not animations, are they? Sorry, I seem to be in a pedantic mood at the moment. 😉
LikeLike
They’re animated… Lol.
I actually wish my program could handle proper animation.. Wait, no I don’t.. I wouldn’t have a life at all! 🙂
LikeLike
Found a list and this specific one.
Am catching up now …
LikeLike
Yeah, sorry about that mate..
Up the top of my blog there’s also a Graphics page, of which the WFF comics are in one list and other animations are in another.
LikeLike